The Sights

Book

This page uses page 33 as a template for the third time.

 

When we open our hearts: An engineered Universe appears.

Some content from page 34 sets the starting context for this page. Enjoy.

The electronic versions of our books can be purchased from the Kindle store.

Check out our videos on YouTube. First video. And Second video.

Amino-acids

Nitrogen based lifeforms.

Deep Universe

The periodic table.

Toes in the sand

The scientific test.

Under a tree

And contemplating, right?

Eyes up

Let hope arise.

Gizmos

Intelligence and ingenuity.


Introductory context

Where did we finish? Ah yes. Enjoy.

Remember now, sonnets are meant to be spoken.

Henri








For Clearer views: Check our premises.

This is our continuing project: The search for happiness, destiny and how to rescue souls. "A look at life". Enjoy.

Some of the following content will have a deeper context after reading Contemplate the Universe, Beyond the veil, The Touch, Destiny calls and Afterglow.

Our reminder again, just like someone looking at the last few pages of a book, we may catch the flame, but have missed the fireworks in between. So make sure to take a look at some of the previous content of this website, if you've jumped straight to this page. We've covered a bit of ground.

 

After that, it appears that it is almost essential to look at the half hour tutorial on the Central Dogma of Biology, which we have placed on Page 13 of this website. If we start mentioning, "turbines", that's where to look.

Henri


 

We've been making a few comments on Stephen Hawking's book, "The Grand Design". Chapter seven changes that to, "Apparent Miracle", and the next, last, chapter, called, The Grand Design, is mostly about a computer simulation, with some final remarks about how the Universe can create itself, out of nothing, because negative and positive energies will cancel themselves out. What's that? Oh yes, no design, all for their click bait narratives.




 

I'll again make some extended comments on that sonnet, since it's at the start of this page. The above was prompted by my encounter, this morning, on my walk, with the suburban visitors who regularly set up camp on the way to the local High school. Two blokes today, normally it's two ladies. I asked them my standard question, "Who made the Universe", knowing full well that they teach Michael, the Arch-Angel made it, and everything else.

They said, Jehovah God made it, and then we went back and forth with that contradiction. They tried to read a Bible verse to me, which I knew, so didn't let them finish. I left them but afterwards, down the road a bit, I thought I could have said, "Don't quote a Bible verse, just talk to me". Oh well.

For the above situation, we find ourselves, as evolution skeptics, confronting a four-pronged attack. Either there is no God, an evil god, or we have a God who is not god but an Angel, and with the evolutionists, if we say anything associated with a God, on any cultural issues, we'll find someone will come along and say we are corrupting the purity of science and education system. Drama, drama.

We have touched on this before. The evolutionists and the suburban visitors have suspiciously similar tactics on methods and targeting. So the above was on the evolutionists but the content was prompted by the suburban visitors. All the drama and excitement of the origins debate. We don't listen to them, and they don't listen to us.

That comment about watching, with mute on, is how we watch Sir David's shows. We see he's started his next series in Australia. Based on our comments in the past, will we see something new. We don't have high expectations, with the sex, violence, and how cute the babies are. Looks like the technology has improved and the slo-mos are even slower, and looks like some exceptional shots using modern drone technology. Also, I think he might be pushing the, "humans are a plague" line.






 

Blue and gold? We went for a drive today and sat under a tree for a while. The wind was strong and we watched a kite surfing club enjoy their day. Some very skilful, spectacular jumps, and some learning. Eternity away from evolution theory.



 

Life from life? I sometimes say to people, there's only one law in biology, the law of biogenesis: life from life. but there's probably more. I think we quote another one on page 4 of this website, accessed from the bottom of page 3, where there's a link to, "It's Cosmic". That's page 4.

It's called, "Cope's law of the unspecialized". We think it's a fantastic law for evolution skeptics because it refers to how organisms become more specialized as time goes by, and then maybe they go extinct. As in, devolution, where they have more potential, the further back we go.





 

We are regularly thankful for the pioneers who have gone before on our topics. And have been interested in how the Bible got to us. Possibly like the end of the Star Wars movie, Rogue one. The struggle, they've left us, but we have their legacy. You can feel the drama around the time of King Henry VIII, Queen Elizabeth I, and King James I.

With the mention of demons again, we have noticed, in Australia at the moment, that mental health is just as real and physical health, and the growing realization that its been ignored in the past. This website is focused on giving a positive world view, but we know we are children of our times. On that topic, if someone has read our previous material, on previous pages, and sees a double meaning there, we are not going to panic.



 

Quantum state? We've heard the rumour that eyes can detect a single photon. In most circumstances, except the origins debate, that would be considered fairly good. But if you listen to the prominent evolutionists of today, our eyes are not that good at all. As in, they don't detect infra-red or ultra-violet, and all the dramas with the nerves in front of the detectors, and the blind spot.

The garden elves? We've said this before, Richard Dawkins has all the good stuff. He has a list, including Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, the garden elves, etc, that we believe in if we think there's a God out there. Obviously, we think the list applies to him, for saying chemical reactions can give the data and machines found in life. Someone who has just read the last batch of bubbles, could find we have been a little bit brazen. Yes, we admit it.

Research topic: I'm sure I'm not the only one to ask this question, with all the drama with the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, is there a process where we can go straight from carbon dioxide, water and light, to alcohol. For energy, not to drink. I remember playing with dry ice when I was a kid. Where's that stuff gone?

On the topic of drinking, I don't normally have alcoholic drinks myself, but I have on my desk a small book of poems I wrote, before "It's Cosmic" and "Contemplate the Universe", called, "Henri's Australian Verse", and that has a lot of drinking poems in it, although I'm not a drinker. What happened there? I put it on my desk the other day, because I wanted to show someone an ANZAC poem, I wrote years ago.

On the back I had scribbled: Not by chance => Gravity, Electricity, Magnetism, Light, Atoms, Machines. As in, they won't be able to use survival of the fittest to account for those. And then we can add to that, DNA codes, because, as evolutionists say, DNA is the overwhelming link to all life. Unfortunately for them, the code hasn't changed much across all life, and, bummer for them, it gets more complicated, the further back we go. And we now know DNA is the machine codes and control for the machines to make proteins. Page 13.




 

We've put what we mean by hi-tech in an introduction before, but it's nice to see it fit into a bubble.



 

Fuse? I think Stephen Hawking uses the term 'touch paper', for fuse, to spark a Universe (Big Bang theory), I gather alluding to lighting a sky rocket, like we did in the days back when we could do that ourselves. The second last line, "We look through cells, a Universe, and time,", is a reference to our "triple filter" we introduced on page 30, and on the front cover of our fifth book, "Afterglow". 4/2/2019.

We give the reminder, on what we wrote after we had finished our fourth book. We came to the realization that we had just written 1700 thought bubbles to say, "Family is more important than science". Mid way down page 28. The triage we set before us was, science, family, and truth. We decided to go with, family, truth, then science. Most evolutionists won't be impressed with that sequence.


 

At the moment, we are celebrating two, well accepted, scientific facts. 1. The Universe from nothing. And 2. The law of biogenesis: Life from life. And we enjoy the confirmation in sacred verse of our God creating everything out of nothing, and that includes an awesome Universe, and the data and machines we find in life. It's a fantastic boost to our confidence, when evolutionists insist that science cannot be done if we mention God.

With "Created in his image", we can work backwards from the highest images of humanity, to contemplate on God. We enjoy music, colour, working with our hands, creating things, etc. Get the idea? And then, wow for us, there's a lot of poetry in the world, and sacred verse.

We hope you take some time to pause on those two ideas. Maybe take a hint from the bubble at the top of the page: "Turn off your phone, iPod and CPU", to see that science and the Bible agree, there's a family God out there, and we have been given our opportunity, right now, to weigh all that.

And check the second one. Our standard views have taken the one who contemplates out of the equation, to say that's more scientific. But we start with us, contemplating, standing in front of the information technology and machinery in life, for our scientific view (Page 13). And for our overviews we look beyond all that, beyond hi-tech life, beyond an awesome, useful Universe, to hear the echo, down through time, "With the Lord, one day is like a thousand years". 2 Peter 3:8. Catch that? Relativity.


 

That thought bubble was having a go at Richard Dawkins. I occasionally say to myself I'm about 10 to 20 years behind on some aspects of the origins debate, because his star is on the wane. But then I give myself an upper cut because I just have to visit the science sections of our bookshops for a reality check. Heaps of his books.

And then we have him on the web, YouTube, etc, saying how exciting something from nothing is. Then, we've written on this before, the history lessons where they bring out the straw men, shoot them down, and look good doing it. What do we say? Drama and excitement.








 

I just gave myself part of a reality check by re-reading Ecclesiastes. We don't need the evolutionists to give us a reality check with all the drama on this planet. I had been thinking of the verse that mentions, the silver cord being untied when we die. I have always found that an interesting image. Solomon puts everyone on the same level as death is the equalized for all of us. It's a dismal set of images.

I wonder whether he would change his view, if he knew then, what measures his Creator would take to rescue his family.












 

I just spent a bit of time checking the web for evolution language. We've touched in this many times in the past. We know evolutionists use value laden words in their descriptions, although we know that chemicals are reacting when they think, and write, something. It's why we think there are very few real atheists out there. Real atheists, know there are no values, and they actually say so.

Some words we hit ctrl C/ctrl V on were: "Desirable traits, better, advantageous and unhelpful traits, mistakes, worse, beneficial, harmful or neutral. The process of culling bad mutations and spreading good mutations is called natural selection." We know they use a lot more than that.

We give the reminder that if we use a word like, 'mistake', we are conceding something was right in the first place, and we are making a judgement call. In that, we may be assuming that we know which direction evolution is going. That's a big call, and that's the short version.

In that process, we found a fantastic quote from BBC - Earth, when explaining evolution: "Step by step, worms became fish, fish came onto land and developed four legs, those four-legged animals grew hair and, eventually, some of them started walking around on two legs, called themselves "humans" and discovered evolution". Obviously, from this website's perspective, we wish we had written that. It glows with honesty, and we can imagine the wicked smirk when writing it.




 

We've written this before, on the definition of evolution. If you hit the search engines, the majority of meanings will say something about change in lifeforms. That might suit the evolutionists, who want to say evolution is a fact, but it doesn't suit evolution skeptics.

From our perspective, Darwin's big idea was, transmutation of species, and one family tree, growing in a warm little pond somewhere in the past, and any other meaning is for propaganda purposes, to make evolution more palatable to the public.





 

After searching on evolution theory, I decided to search on, evolution skeptics. In both cases, you get evolution, so it's wall to wall. Same thing with convergent evolution.


 

We've been cleaning up, because family time is at our place this year. An archaeological dig, with many executive decisions made on things for the dump. I found a leaflet with a list of promises for believers. I might convert some into thought bubbles. Some complicated words, which I'll try not to use.




 

I couldn't resist using some of the BBC - Earth quote, above. A great quote.



 

Other processes? What's that? It's the process to go from Nothing, heat, gas, then people so, we can contemplate Uranium.





Contact us

The electronic version of "Contemplate the Universe" can be purchased from the Kindle store. For some context on associated books, search on "Intelligent design".

Say G'Day: henri@ctubybp.com.au