What spin, after they huff, creationist?

No spin at all, if knowing they have won.

Their overconfidence cannot be missed,

As if, "no God" is plain to anyone.

That gives them all those licences

To spin something akin to Santa Clause.

Like physical defining sciences,

So nothing as their scientific cause.

"Creationist". They use it like a charm,

Accompanied by negative blue air.

It's why we're always ringing the alarm.

With evolutionists, insults are fair.

They realize they hold the higher ground,

And seem to have humanity spellbound.

26/10/2017

What sets the nature of reality?

It's integrating differential spheres.

It's in fortuitous transparency

In all constituents of atmospheres,

Or hydrosphere, or cosmological.

It's changing of refractive indices,

But still coherence with the optical.

It's in untangling those frequencies,

But still give us a Universe out there

To see, using processing media.

Oh yes, 3D optical hardware,

But still the clear vitreous humor.

Beyond sensational. So life can see.

Beyond a technical reality.

28/10/2017

Oh count the positives in anything,

If life is difficult and we're depressed.

If unsuccessful in our struggling,

We know we've had causality to test:

The mystic patterns of the Universe.

Included in those challenges, maybe

Some preconceived ideas to reverse.

Not all of life is drama and calamity.

We have reality to link to personal,

With positives we cannot overlook.

My soul, if it's something emotional,

No, don't consult a scientific book.

Beyond the physical, for challenges,

So only slightly linked to sciences.

29/10/2017

Oh yes, we have the cosmic masterpiece

And wherewithal to help us contemplate.

We have the evolution thought police

With their mandates on how to meditate.

What now? Inject some balance into this.

After debating for millennia?

When thought police deny a synthesis?

Against the might of all mass media?

Against our Universities and schools?

Balance? New meaning for an optimist

If all teach we're just random molecules.

What now, for any transcendentalist?

We'll need a hand with all that balancing.

Lucky, we have biology and bling.

30/10/2017/

In cells, we have the sensor elements

For recognition of a 3D shape.

The inbuilt specified requirements,

All recognition software for that shape,

The implemented quality control,

And signals for a complementary pair,

Inside a micro, mini vacuole,

With backup systems for its self-repair.

The evolutionists say that evolved.

The antibody system set by chance,

With only blind coincidence involved,

And only blind mutations to enhance.

It's certain that they'll huff, creationist.

But that comes not from any scientist.

30/10/2017

When atheists crank up the decibels,

They'll all deny the technological:

Incredible complexity in cells,

An understatement on incredible.

That technical could point to deity.

"Creationist!" The decibels increase,

"It's the illusion of technology".

A cellular, miniature masterpiece?

An understatement on miniature?

Oh yes, potential in each embryo,

And perfect magic of the cellular.

What do they have for their scenario?

Obsession with the sex and violence

To underpin their no-god inference.

30/10/2017

Whatever went on back in Eden's glade,

A Saviour would be taking centre stage.

After assurances, the flaming blade,

After the promises, our death our wage.

But oh, those promises have never died.

The plan was set, and culminating in

The day the Lamb of God was crucified.

A Saviour died, so new life could begin,

A God, had made himself vulnerable,

And blessed humanity could now arise

To contemplate that awesome miracle.

Yes, meditate on that one-off,,, Sonrise.

It's now our turn to shine, under the Son.

New life can start today, for anyone.

31/10/2017

His destiny, our shoes. Yes, Wonderful.

The Engineer became the volunteer,

Engaging in an awesome miracle,

With promises now absolutely clear.

A loving, saving, caring God has now

Obtained undoubted credibility.

That theoretical, eternal vow

Has crystalized, to pay for destiny.

What now, when destiny is calling us?

Don't hesitate, tomorrow may be lost.

Embrace the meaning of miraculous,

To then appreciate that precious cost.

Oh realize that could be bottomless.

Yes, deity has purchased happiness.

31/10/2017

There's multiplexing in each living cell,

Arising from purported warm rock soup.

From chemicals and sunlight. Oh do tell.

With all controls, using a feedback loop,

That gem evolved bazillion years ago,

And given all those skills to reproduce.

After gazillion years, scientists know,

It found another complicated use.

Oh tell us more? It could communicate,

So changed into the multicellular.

No doubt, it learned how to coordinate.

For elements, not much was easier.

With cosmic laws, that's unavoidable?

And all that grandeur, undeniable?

1/11/2017

Oh check, all cellular is bottomless.

A lifetime study will not be enough.

All evolutionists cite randomness,

So all will emphasize it's only stuff.

It's systematic and controllable,

But it's just gunk, say evolutionists.

Although extremely technological,

And analysed by many specialists,

All evolutionists stick to their spin.

Those specialists study the DNA,

But told it's from a random origin.

Would that be sciences in disarray?

Oh yes, but they will never realize.

The want biology to self-arise.

1/11/2017

Lucky for us, the aviation fuels

Are not a part of evolution spin.

We may be only random molecules,

But on self-preservation, yes, we're in.

And no, microprocessors aren't either.

All good. We don't like unpredictable,

And don't like random in the furniture,

In aeroplanes and in the technical.

What of the sciences in all of that?

Robust, and luckily, reliable,

So nowhere near the random caveat.

No evolution sets the technical.

Reliable? That sets the Universe.

All good, and X-factor to intersperse.

2/11/2017

What of the major step in history?

Was it the subatomic particles

To start? Or rocks to give utility?

Or DNA, set by four syllables?

Or that biology inside of us?

All excellent, but none of the above.

It's TLC in human consciousness.

Oh yes, it's our ability to love.

It's our abilities to contemplate,

To calculate, to know the personal,

To then appreciate and oh, create.

Oh yes, make anything industrial.

From chance? Not if it's creativity.

But perfect for the skills of deity.

2/11/2017

If media spin sex and violence,

Are any scientific facts in there?

Some cool biological evidence,

Or some on cosmological hardware?

No way. They spin the unpredictable,

Coincidence, and if there's any facts,

They'll say the sky is blue. Predictable:

Just what their random caveat enacts.

Why sex and violence? It's good TV,

And indicates a God has lost control.

Yes, thought police spin that calamity,

But never stress a dying Saviour's role.

That's our responsibility. Balance.

Set by the Grand Designer inference.

3/11/2017

If we have doubts about their origin,

Check out how evolutionists react.

"No God exists so rocks turned into men.

That's based on solid scientific fact,

And we corrupt our schools if skeptical".

They stress a random cosmic interplay,

No matter if all life is technical,

Or if it's programming in DNA.

Nothing evolved to give us everything?

A real world view, if ever there was one.

They stress their theory is enlightening,

And for all life, theirs is the only one.

Nothing, except evolution makes sense?

Oh resurrect essential common sense.

4/11/2017

They tell us swans evolved by gravity.

The they being the evolutionists

Who push their quantum instability.

That sounds ridiculous, but each insists.

They have the overwhelming evidence

That gravity makes everything appear,

Including swans, helped by coincidence.

A mix of water, light, some atmosphere,

Geology and time gave us the swans.

That instability, from nothing, gave

The beauty of the feathered ailerons,

Their DNA and how the swans behave.

Yes, gravity just seems incredible.

As in, always akin to miracle.

5/11/2017

Nothing, then quantum singularity,

And there we go, perfect utility.

A mix of chemicals and energy,

Then similar, evolved complexity.

Magic how evolutionists can spin

Coincidence and equal likelihood.

Since they mandate a no-god origin,

It's magical, as if from Hollywood,

And luckily, fortuitous for them,

Creation or design are not allowed.

Oh yes, the magical continuum

When following the evolution crowd.

Complexity from nothing, wacky-do.

Inside their spin, it's absolutely true.

7/11/2017

Analogy and then homology?

The evolutionists spin both of those.

It matters not about complexity,

In origins, yes, we know how it goes.

But that's convergence or inheritance,

Just using other highfalutin names.

Yes, they want all the cake ingredients,

With their equivocating verbal games.

Yes, everything has equal likelihood,

All similarities, all differences,

So fits their evolution spin. All good,

And they tell us it's from the sciences.

No wonder all exude their confidence.

With origins, they own all evidence.

7/11/2017

For education thought police, all good.

No matter what complexity there is,

All outcomes have an equal likelihood.

No need to be some scientific whiz.

What of the skeptical in all of that?

We go with final and initial states,

So no, a sensor or a thermostat

Won't self-arise as nothing percolates,

And rocks will never weave some DNA.

Yes, focus in on life's machinery

To implement the scientific way.

The details count with high complexity.

For evolutionists, religious spin.

For skeptical, transcendent origin.

8/11/2017

If we say we are evolutionists,

Would anybody know what's going on

If we are also transcendentalists?

Yes, we check natural phenomenon,

We also check inheritance and change,

And on the altering gene frequencies,

Then we're okay if alleles rearrange.

Yes, with some evolution qualities,

We're in their camp, a monster definite.

But after that, it's more that natural

For life to rise from what's inanimate,

To give us art, or give us technical.

Yes, any tag is fuzzy in debate,

If knowing thought police manipulate.

11/11/2017

'Created in his image' carries weight.

What quality is that? It's personal.

It's our imagination, to create,

It's family, and love, and technical.

All things the evolutionists deny.

Stardust, beyond all scientific doubt.

We have all those illusions to defy

And all our sciences to help us out.

Image? Then put on our humanity?

If that's not intimate, then nothing is.

Those thought police are big on deity,

But don't trust evolution premises,

Our God is only but a breath away.

Always accessible, on any day.

11/11/2017

Since DNA is really programming,

That sets the nature of reality.

And with the cosmological for bling,

That view incorporates a deity.

With origins, that evidence gives us

The opportunity to test world views.

Yes, two alternatives for happiness

In life. We come from deity or ooze.

Augmented ooze for evolutionists

Or else,,, real happiness with deity,

Adopted by the transcendentalists?

Oh yes, real choice and opportunity.

Alternatives are stark in origins.

Veiled deity, the ooze, or aliens.

16/11/2017

So how can heat just differentiate

To give a Universe in which humanity

Can live, and anyone to contemplate?

What trait, inside a singularity,

Rewrites again the subatomic laws

For any universe to self-arise?

No differentiation for that cause,

Or detailing for us to recognize,

Remembering it's just heat energy.

What rescues that? Non-equilibrium,

In all the steps, up to humanity.

But that is not the real continuum

Set by machinery and programming.

Oh yes, the techno touch in anything.

16/11/2017

What of the core of origins debates?

What place for deity and miracles,

What's up if anybody contemplates,

Is life a gift or quantum particles.

What of our DNA from sciences?

The four-bit language of biology.

All those control and data nuances

For hi-tech, nano-sized machinery.

Yes, it's about technology and care,

Equivocation by the thought police,

And how to recognize artistic flair

Inherent in the cosmic masterpiece.

A tip from all the transcendentalists?

Change up criteria for scientists.

20/11/2017

If purpose disappears from origins,

Our sciences become ridiculous.

If there's no God to give those origins,

Our science cannot state the obvious:

All teeth? For digestion pre-processing.

That's not allowed with evolution spin,

Since purpose won't apply to anything.

Remember now, their random origin:

All movement and delusions of design,

No parts to list, nothing to integrate,

No God, just stuff, as molecules align,

And just illusions as we contemplate.

But teeth are really for the obvious.

Nothing intentional? Preposterous.

23/11/2017

Can DNA evolve? That would be no.

And what of its hi-tech machinery?

No way, not in gazillion years or so.

Is that from evolution certainty?

Sifting the evidence along the way?

A code for humans and bacteria,

So always similar, from its first day?

For sciences, not much is fuzzier.

No evolution in four billion years?

It's not too hard to spot the obvious:

For all the complicated biospheres,

Blind evolution's just ridiculous.

But evolutionists remain as proud.

Creation and design are disallowed.

23/11/2017

Pick any part in all biology.

Has it a purpose, is it functional?

At nanoscopic scale, machinery,

Precise and highly technological.

Purpose? Oh yes, and fairly obvious

If scrutinized with scientific eyes.

The molecules to make up all of us,

Arranged to let humanity arise,

To let us meditate on subtleties?

It's integrated networks for all that.

A world away from singularities

Mandated by the no-god caveat.

Ignore that metaphysical mandate.

All scientific parts to contemplate.

24/11/2017